Dram shop claims cause a fair bit of controversy, and a lot of it is justified because there is almost always a legal gray area involved in the court of law, and it is up to the judge or jury to determine the ultimate solution to a case. Dram shop claims are especially susceptible to subjectivity. These claims place responsibility on a restaurant or bar that serves alcohol for what their intoxicated patrons do. For example, an intoxicated person who caused a fight could pursue a case against the restaurant that allowed it to happen (and charged him for the alcoholic beverages) and, just as importantly, the victim in the establishment could sue the bar for allowing that man to get intoxicated to such a degree.
First Party
The above details an obvious distinction in the two types of dram shop cases one can pursue. A first party case is one set forward by the person who is intoxicated, and he or she is pursuing action against the restaurant for allowing them to have too much alcohol. Presumably, the individual has caused a stir of some kind, such as being arrested outside the restaurant. Not all states allow for first party pursuits. Speak with the team at Website Domain to learn if a first party case is viable.
Third Party
A non-intoxicated gentleman is paying at the register and an intoxicated person runs into him, knocks him over and in the stumbled fall, the man breaks his hip. He has a justifiable reason to sue the establishment for allowing this intoxicated man to run around in the restaurant knocking into people as well as drinking enough to even be in the condition he is. This is the heart of a third party case. It is far more common than the first party cases because it involves a more clear-cut victim; furthermore, all states have these third party statutes in place.
Dram shop claims are not always clear and they are not always fair but they try to provide a sense of justice and logic to alcohol and public intoxication, and that can always be a bit tricky.
Watch our video on YouTube!
